Abstract |
|
Over the past 70 years, temporomandibular joint
(TMJ) diseases have been subjected to shifts in conceptual
understanding. Unable to account for disease patterns, the
mismatch between case assignment and treatment need, and different
interventions producing similar treatment outcomes (although
at varying levels of risks to patients), emerging theories
make persuasive arguments in support of alternative explanations
that conceptualize TMJ diseases as complex conditions influenced
by genetic susceptibility, environmental factors and risk-conferring
behaviors. |
|